Reviewer Guideline

The Journal of Manufacturing and Intelligent Systems (JMIS) sincerely appreciates the valuable contributions of its reviewers. The journal operates a double-blind peer-review process, and reviewers are expected to provide fair, objective, and constructive evaluations.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

• Accept review invitations only if the manuscript matches their expertise.

• Complete the review within the requested timeframe.

• Maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.

• Declare any potential conflicts of interest.

• Provide clear, respectful, and constructive comments that help improve the manuscript.

• Base their evaluation solely on the scientific quality, originality, and relevance of the work.

Evaluation Criteria

When reviewing a manuscript, please consider the following:

• Relevance to the journal's scope

• Originality and scientific contribution

• Technical and methodological soundness

• Quality of data analysis and interpretation

• Clarity of presentation and organization

• Adequacy of references and discussion

• Validity of the conclusions

Ethical Considerations

Reviewers should immediately notify the editor if they suspect plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, ethical misconduct, or any other issue that may affect the integrity of the manuscript.

Recommendation

Please select one of the following recommendations:

• Accept

• Minor Revision

• Major Revision

• Reject

The final publication decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.

The Editorial Board thanks all reviewers for their valuable time, expertise, and commitment to maintaining the scientific quality of JMIS.